An operator, not an agency.
Optivant OS was started by an operator — a former COO. Someone who understands operations.

Three seats, one problem.
The operator
As the former COO of a 150,000+ square ft life sciences incubator with more than 50 tenant companies, running it meant assessing, building and testing the systems underneath it — the processses, the applications, the workflows, the things that were always manual.
The banker
Twenty years in commercial banking, including dedicated life sciences coverage. Two decades of understanding what made companies successful, understanding the weaknesses, seeing the challenges and providing solutions to help them grow. It is a habit that turns out to be useful when someone hands you twenty software subscriptions and no register.
The connector
President of BioStrategy Partners, a nonprofit consortium aggregating translational research across academic medical centers. Which is another way of saying: a career spent getting organizations that don't naturally talk to each other to work off the same page and turn ideas into commercial companies.
The conversation starts further along.
Most people who will sell you marketing automation have never carried operational responsibility for a real business. They have run campaigns. That is a different job, and you can hear the difference in the first ten minutes of a call.
The reason Optivant OS starts with an assessment rather than a build is not methodology for its own sake. It is what twenty years of asking companies where their money goes teaches you: the answer is almost never where they think, and almost never solved by adding another tool. Most of the value in the first ninety days comes from retiring things, not buying things.
And in life sciences specifically, you do not have to explain the context. Not what a Series A looks like, not why the burn schedule matters, not why the CDMO relationship is the one that cannot slip.
Optivant OS was developed to help optimize the things being done manually so more work can be done efficiently. \u00a0To do that, you have to have the right software, \u00a0analyze processes, and allow automation to be maximized— with someone accountable for keeping it running afterwards.
Four things worth saying plainly.
You will work with me, not someone overseas.
At this size, that is the product.
I will tell you when something is out of scope.
Including when the honest answer is that you do not need what you came in asking for.
You own your data and your subscriptions.
Always. We administer on your behalf and hand over cleanly if you leave.
Every recommendation comes with arithmetic.
If I cannot show you the number, I should not be asking you for the budget.